Evaluation of
Antimicrobial and Phytochemical Properties of some Indigenous Indian plants
Robinka Khajuria, Loveleen Kaur*, Aditi Kaushik
and Gurpreet Saredia
Department of Biotechnology, Lovely Professional
University, Phagwara-144402
*Corresponding Author E-mail: loveleen.16406@lpu.co.in
ABSTRACT:
Methanolic, ethanolic and aqueous extracts of ten
indigenous Indian plants Alstonia scholaris, Anthocepalus cadamba, Elaeocarpus ganitrus, Madhuca indica, Butea frundosa, Berberis aristata, Abutilon indicum,
Nyctanthes arbor tristis,
Aegle marmelos and Urginea indica were investigated for antimicrobial activity
against E. coli, B. subtilis and S. aureus followed by determination of Minimum inhibitory
concentration of the plant extracts. A primary phytochemical
screening was done to determine the presence of Terpenoids,
Tannins, Anthraquinone, Steroids, Saponins,
Alkaloids and Flavonoids. Methanolic
extract of B. aristata was found to have potent
antibacterial activity against three bacterial cultures followed by A. indicum.
The largest zone of inhibition (24mm) was observed against B. subtilis in the presence of crude Methanolic extract of B.
aristata. Minimal Inhibitory concentration B.aristata was
found to vary from 40µg/ml to 73µg/ml for the three bacterial cultures. All the
tested phytochemicals were present in B.aristata and A. cadamba
indicating that these plants could be further exploited for production of bioformulations for treating infectious diseases.
KEYWORDS: Antimicrobial property, Berberis aristata, Indigenous plants, Minimum
inhibitory concentration, Phytochemicals
INTRODUCTION:
Since the past
few decades, emerging and re-emerging multidrug resistant pathogenic strains of
microorganisms have become a chief cause of concern for the medical
practitioners worldwide. Screening of
several medicinal plants for their potential antimicrobial activity is being
noticed due to the increasing failure of conventional chemotherapeutics and
antibiotics (Colombo et al.1996,
Rojas et al 2003, Bandow et al 2003, Zinn
et al 2004). In recent years,
secondary plant metabolites (phytochemicals),
formerly having unknown pharmacological activities, have been extensively
investigated as a source of medicinal agents (Joshi et al 2011). The beneficial
products from plants result from combinations of different secondary
metabolites like alkaloids, saponins, tannins, anthraquinone, etc. Exploitation of these phytochemicals produced by certain plants can serve as a
solution to the ever increasing problem of drug resistant pathogens.
India is one of the World’s top 12 mega diversity countries with 10 biogeographical regions. The assemblage of climatic and
altitudinal variations coupled with variations in ecological habitats has led to
the development of unique diversity in medicinal plants which serve as source
of raw material for traditional medicine systems as well as for pharmaceutical
industries.(Pushpangadan
2002). India has more than 1/4th of World’s known medicinal
plants with over 8000 plants species. Over one and a half million traditional healers use a wide range of
medicinal plants for treating ailments of both humans and livestock across the
length and breadth of the country. Different parts of ethnomedical
plants or their extracts are used for the treatment of various diseases. This study was undertaken in order to carry
out preliminary investigative studies on the antimicrobial properties of ten
indigenous Indian plants against three test organisms. Moreover, phytochemical analysis was carried out in order to detect
the presence of different phytochemicals known for
their therapeutic effects.
Table1: List of plants used in
the study and their traditional importance
|
Family |
Botanical Name |
Local Name |
Plant part Tested |
Major Traditional Uses (References) |
|
Apocynaceae |
Alstonia
scholaris |
Sataparni (Devil Tree) |
Leaves |
Treatment of Epilepsy,
Asthma, Malarial Fever, Urticaria, Chronic Dysentery,
Diarrhoea (Lee et
al, 2012) |
|
Rubiaceae |
Anthocepalus cadamba |
Kadam |
Leaves |
Antidiuretic, Anthelmintic, Blood
purifier, Analgesic |
|
Elaeocar-paceae |
Elaeocarpus ganitrus |
Rudraksh |
Leaves |
Treatment of mental diseases, epilepsy, asthma, hypertension, arthritis and liver diseases (Hule and
Juvekar, 2009) |
|
Sapotaceae |
Madhuca indica |
Mahua |
Leaves |
Pain killer, Anthelmintic, Antidiabetic, Analgesic,
Antiarthritis agent (Shekhawat
and Vijayvergiya, 2010) |
|
Fabaceae |
Butea frundosa |
Palash |
Leaves |
Astringent, Diuretic,
Depuretive, Aphrodisiac and Tonic
properties. Effective in leprosy, leucorrhoea and gout. (Das et al, 2012) |
|
Berberidaceae |
Berberis
aristata |
Indian Barberry
or Daru Haridra |
Leaves |
Antipyretic, antibacterial, antihepatotoxic,
anticancer antihyperglycaemic, antioxidant and antilipidemic agent. (Potdar et al, 2012) |
|
Malvaceae |
Abutilon indicum |
Atibala |
Leaves |
Aphrodisiac, laxative,
diuretic, sedative, astringent,tonic, anti-inflammatory,
anthelmintic, and analgesic agent. (Rajakaruna et al,
2002) |
|
Oleaceae |
Nyctanthes
arbortristis |
Parijat or Harsingar |
Leaves |
Antibacterial, Anthelmintic, Antiinflammatory, Hepatoprotective, Immunopotential, Antipyretic,
Antioxidant and Anti fungal. (Saxena et al, 2002) |
|
Rutaceae |
Aegle marmelos |
Bael or Bilvapatra |
Leaves |
Antibacterial, Treatment of constipation and other gastrointestinal problems. (Pattnaik et al,1996) |
|
Asparagaceae |
Urginea indica |
Jangli Kanda |
Leaves |
Expectorant, cardiac, stimulant, diuretic, bronchitis,
chronic asthma, deobstruent (Shiva-Kameshwari
et al, 2012) |
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Collection of
plant material:
Leaves of all the ten indigenous Indian plants, Alstonia scholaris,
Anthocepalus cadamba, Elaeocarpus ganitrus, Madhuca indica, Berberis aristata, Abutilon indicum, Nyctanthes arbor-tristis, Aegle marmelos, Urginea indica and Butea frondosa were collected from Botanical garden of Panjab University, Chandigarh and Herbal Garden, Lovely
Professional University, Phagwara (Table 1)
Preparation of
plant sample:
Fresh Green leaves were washed under running tap water, dried in hot air
oven at 600C for 24 hours and ground to fine powder.
Maintenance of
bacterial culture:
24 hour old broth cultures of Escherichia
coli, Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus were maintained in
actively growing state by regular subculturing.
Preparation of
Plant Extracts:
15 gm of leaf powder was extracted with methanol by continuous hot
extraction for 8 hours. The extract obtained was concentrated in vacuum rotary evaporator and was used for
determination of antibacterial activity as described by Joshi et al (2011). The crude samples were
subjected to phytochemical screening for the presence
of Terpenoids, Tannins, Anthraquinone,
Steroids, Saponins, Alkaloids and Flavonoids.
Similarly extraction was carried out using ethanol as extractant. 15 gm of leaf powder was also used for
preparation of hot water extract and extraction was carried out according to Parekh
and Chanda (2007).
Table2: Determination of zone of inhibition of indigenous Indian plant
extracts against different test organisms.
|
|
*Zone of
Inhibition(diameter in mm) |
||||||||
|
Test Organism
Plants |
E. coli |
S. aureus |
B. subtilis |
||||||
|
M |
E |
A |
M |
E |
A |
M |
E |
A |
|
|
Alstonia scholaris |
12.3 |
12.0 |
12.3 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
5.7 |
ND |
5.6 |
|
Anthocepalus cadamba |
ND |
ND |
ND |
6.3 |
ND |
6.3 |
8.3 |
7.5 |
8.3 |
|
Elaeocarpus ganitrus |
8.3 |
6.5 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
8.0 |
8.3 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
|
Madhuca indica |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
8.3 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
|
Butea frundosa |
6.3 |
6.0 |
6.3 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
|
Berberis aristata |
22.0 |
20.0 |
19.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
18.0 |
24.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
|
Abutilon indicum |
14.0 |
18.0 |
12.0 |
20.0 |
16.0 |
13.0 |
18.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
|
Nyctanthes arbor – tristis |
18.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
13.0 |
14.0 |
16.0 |
12.0 |
|
Aegle marmelos |
16.0 |
11.0 |
12.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
13.0 |
9.0 |
12.0 |
8.0 |
|
Urginea indica |
12.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
|
CD@5% |
3.29 |
2.37 |
1.47 |
1.48 |
1.77 |
1.49 |
1.74 |
1.57 |
1.42 |
M- Methanolic Extract, E- Ethanolic Extract,
A- Aqueous Extract, ND- Not Detected
* Average of three replicates
Antimicrobial assay:
Lawn culture of
the three bacterial cultures were prepared on nutrient agar plates using
sterile swabs. Wells were prepared using 4mm cork borer and 100µl of methanolic extract, ethanolic extract and hot aqueous
extract was added in their respective wells. 1mg/ml of Ampicillin
was used as Positive control and respective solvent was used as a negative
control. Plates were than incubated at 370C for 24 hours. Thereafter
diameter of zone of inhibition was measured and recorded. Zone less than 5mm
was considered to be non-detectable.
Antimicrobial assay:
Lawn culture of
the three bacterial cultures were prepared on nutrient agar plates using
sterile swabs. Wells were prepared using 4mm cork borer and 100µl of methanolic extract, ethanolic extract and hot aqueous
extract was added in their respective wells. 1mg/ml of Ampicillin
was used as Positive control and respective solvent was used as a negative
control. Plates were than incubated at 370C for 24 hours. Thereafter
diameter of zone of inhibition was measured and recorded. Zone less than 5mm
was considered to be non-detectable.
Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC):
Since methnolic extracts showed better inhibition of
microorganisms, so the residues of plant extracts were dissolved to 25 mg/ml
using methanol. All extracts were serially diluted two-fold to1.95 μg/ml in a 96-multi- well microplate.
100 μl (1 × 106 CFU/ml) of actively
growing bacterial culture was added to each well. Ampicillin
was added as reference antibiotic in each assay. Extract-free solution was used
as the negative control. Pre-incubation absorbance values were read at 630nm.
The microplates were then incubated overnight at 37°C
and absorbance values were read after 24h. MIC values were recorded as the
lowest concentration of the extract that completely inhibited bacterial growth
(Eloff 1998).
Phytochemical screening:
Phytochemical
screening was done to detect the presence of various secondary metabolites (Tiwari et al 2011, Joshi et al 2011)
Tannins: 0.5gm plant powder dissolved in 10ml distilled water and filtered. To 2ml
filtrate, few drops of 1% FeCl3 was added and observed for the
occurrence of blue black, green or blue green precipitate.
Steroids: 0.2gm powder was dissolved in 2ml of acetic acid. Conc. sulphuric acid was added to the ice cold sample and checked
for violet to blue or bluish green coloration.
Terpenoids: 0.5gm of powder
was dissolved in 2ml chloroform. To this 3ml conc. sulphuric
acid was added and observed for the occurrence of reddish brown layer at the
interface.
Saponins: 1gm powder was
dissolved in 5ml distilled water and filtered. To the filtrate, 3ml of
distilled water was added and shaken for 5 min and was observed for persistence
of frothing after boiling.
Flavonoids: 0.5 gm powder was
dissolved in distilled water and filtered. To this 2ml of 10% NaOH was added to give yellow colour.
Change from yellow to colourless on keeping was
observed.
Alkaloids: 1 gm powder was
dissolved in 5ml of 1% aqueous HCl, stirred and
filtered. 1ml of Mayer’s reagent was added to 1ml of the filtrate and observed
for formation of buff coloured precipitates.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:
Determination
of antimicrobial activity of plant extracts:
When methanolic, ethanolic and aqueous extracts
of ten plants were compared, it was found that methanolic
extract was the most effective against all the three bacterial cultures. E.coli was found
to be most susceptible to all the plant extracts followed by S. aureus and B.subtilis
though the maximum zone of inhibition (24mm) was exhibited by methanolic extract of
B.aristata against B.subtilis followed by E.coli (22mm). Extracts of A. indicum and N.
arbor-tristis also proved to be effective
inhibitors against all the three bacterial cultures (Table 2). It is not surprising that there are
differences in the antimicrobial effects of plant species as this could be due
to differences in the phytochemical properties
amongst the species. It is quite possible that some of the plants eg Madhuca indica that
were ineffective in this study do not possess antibiotic properties, or the
plant extracts may have contained antibacterial constituents, just not in
sufficient concentrations so as to be effective. It is also possible that the
active chemical constituents might not be soluble in the solvents used.
Moreover, the drying process may have caused conformational changes to occur in
some of the chemical constituents found in these plants.
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Two-fold serial dilutions of methanolic
extracts of plants were used to determine MIC against E. coli, S. aureus and B. subtilis.
MIC for B. aristata
was evaluated as 40µg/ml, 69 µg/ml, and 73 µg/ml, for B. subtilis, S. aureus
and E. coli respectively showing that
it was potent even at low concentrations. When compared with all plant
extracts, M. indica
was found to be effective at very high concentration (402-525 µg/ml) indicating
its poor antimicrobial activity (Table 3).
Table3: Minimum inhibitory
Concentration of plant extracts against E.coli, S.aureus and B.subtilis
|
Plants Microorganism |
Minimum Inhibitory
Concentration (µg/ml) |
||
|
E.coli |
S.aureus |
B.subtilis |
|
|
Alstonia scholaris |
87 |
135 |
102 |
|
Anthocepalus cadamba |
175 |
289 |
253 |
|
Elaeocarpus ganitrus |
137 |
149 |
102 |
|
Madhuca indica |
402 |
525 |
438 |
|
Butea frundosa |
149 |
188 |
203 |
|
Berberis aristata |
73 |
69 |
40 |
|
Abutilon indicum |
103 |
107 |
125 |
|
Nyctanthes arbortristis |
140 |
158 |
98 |
|
Aegle marmelos |
156 |
238 |
222 |
|
Urginea indica |
292 |
250 |
188 |
Incubation Temperature: 37oC
Table4: Phytochemical
analysis of Plant leaf powder.
|
Phytochemicals Plants |
Terpenoids |
Tannins |
Anthraquinone |
Steroids |
Saponins |
Alkaloids |
Flavonoids |
|
Alstonia scholaris |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
-- |
-- |
+ |
|
Anthocepalus cadamba |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Elaeocarpus ganitrus |
-- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Madhuca indica |
-- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Butea frundosa |
+ |
+ |
|
|
-- |
+ |
-- |
|
Berberis aristata |
+ |
+ |
|
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Abutilon indicum |
+ |
-- |
|
|
+ |
- |
+ |
|
Nyctanthes arbortristis |
+ |
+ |
|
|
-- |
+ |
+ |
|
Aegle marmelos |
+ |
+ |
|
|
-- |
+ |
+ |
|
Urginea indica |
+ |
+ |
|
|
-- |
+ |
-- |
+- Present --
Absent
The MIC can be very crucial for development of bioformulations from
this plant. Similar antimicrobial activity of B. aristata against some human pathogenic
bacteria has also been demonstrated by Wagh and Vidhale (2010) against Staphylococcus
and Pseudomonas spp.
Phytochemical analysis
Preliminary phytochemical
analysis of extract in powder forms revealed the presence of Terpenoids, Tannins, Anthraquinone,
Steroids, Saponins, Alkaloids and Flavonoids.
Flavanoids were present in the leaf powder of all the
plants while tannins were detected from all plant except A. indicum. Presence of other phytochemicals viz. Terpenoids, saponins and alkaloids varied from plant to plant. B. aristata
and A. cadamba were
found to be rich in all the tested phytochemicals
(Table 4). Phytochemical analysis demonstrated valuable phytoconstituents
which can be very useful for therapeutic purposes. Plant extracts exhibiting
potent antimicrobial activity were found to contain most of the tested phytochemicals.
CONCLUSION:
All the ten plant species used in this study exhibited antimicrobial
activities. Most effective results were exhibited by the methanolic
extract of Berberis aristata with a MIC of 40µg/ml, against
B. subtilis.
Primary phytochemical analysis revealed variations in
the phytochemical profiles of plants which explains
the differences in their antimicrobial actions.
REFERENCES:
1. Bandow JE, Brötz H, Leichert LI, Labischinski H, Hecker M. Proteomic approach to understanding antibiotic
action. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2003; 47: 948-955.
2. Colombo ML, Bosisio
E. Pharmacological activities of Chelidonium majus L (Papaveraceae). Pharmacol Res. 1996; 33: 127-134.
3. Das C, Dash S and Sahoo
DC. Pharmacognostical and phytochemical
investigation of Butea
frondosa Linn. Bark. Der
Pharmacia Lettre. 2012; 4 (2):475-482.
4. Eloff JN. A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimum inhibitory
concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta
Medica. 1998; 64:711-71.
5. Hule AMK and Juvekar AR. Effect of alkaloidal fraction of Elaeocarpus ganitrus seeds on murine
in vitro immune parameter. Journal of
Pharmacy Research. 2009; 2(8):1261.
6. Joshi B, Sah GP, Basnet BB, Bhatt MR,
Sharma D, Subedi K, Pandey
J and Malla R. Phytochemical extraction and antimicrobial properties
of different medicinal plants: Ocimum sanctum (Tulsi), Eugenia caryophyllata (Clove),
Achyranthes bidentata
(Datiwan) and Azadirachta
indica (Neem). J Microbiol Antimicrobials. 2011; 3(1): 1-7.
7. Lee SJ, Cho
SA An SS, Na YJ, Park NH, Kim HS, Lee
CW, Kim HK, Kim EK. Alstonia scholaris R.
Br. significantly inhibits retinoid-induced skin irritation in
vitro and in
vivo. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative
Medicine. 2012; doi:10.1155/2012/190370. PMC 3170789. PMID 21912567.
8. Parekh J, Chanda
SV. In vitro antimicrobial activity
and phytochemical analysis of some Indian medicinal
plants. Turk J Biol 2007; 31: 53-58.
9. Pattnaik S, Subramanyam VR
and Kole C. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of
ten essential oils in vitro. Microbios. 1996; 86 (349): 237–246.
10. Potdar D, Hirwani RR,
and Dhulap S. Phyto-chemical
and pharmacological applications of Berberis aristata. Fitoterapia.2012; 83 (5):817-30.
11. Pushpangadan P. Biodiversity and emerging benefit
sharing arrangements-challenges and opportunities for India. Proc. Indian. Natn. Sci. Acad. 2002; B68 (3): 296-314.
12. Rajakaruna N, Harris CS and Towers GHN. Antimicrobial
Activity of Plants Collected from Serpentine
Outcrops in Sri Lanka. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2002; 40 (3): 235–244.
13. Rojas R, Bustamante B, Bauer J, Fernández I, Albán J, Lock O.
Antimicrobial activity of selected Peruvian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol.
2003; 88: 199- 204.
14. Saxena RS, Gupta B and Lata
S. Tranquilizing, antihistaminic and purgative activity of Nyctanthes arbor -tristis leaf extract. J
Ethnopharmacol. 2002; 81 (3): 321–5.
15. Shekhawat N and Vijayvergia
R. Investigation of Anti-Inflammatory, Analgesic and Antipyretic Properties of Madhuca indica GMEL.
International Journal of Molecular Medicine and Advanced Sciences. 2010; 6(2):
26-30.
16. Shiva-Kameshwari MN, Lakshman AB and Paramasivam G. Biosystematics studies on medicinal plant Urginea indica Kunth. liliaceae - A review. Int J Pharm & Life Sci. 2012; 3(1):1394-1406.
17. Tiwari P, Kumar B, Kaur M, Kaur G and Kaur H. Phytochemical screening
and Extraction: A Review. Internationale Pharmaceutica Sciencia. 2011;
1(1):98-106.
18. Wagh S and Vidhale
N.N. Antimicrobial activity of Berberis aristata against some human pathogenic bacteria and
fungi. Biosci Biotech Res Comm. 2010; 3(1): 38-42.
19. Zinn CS, Westh H, Rosdahl VK, and Sarisa Study
Group. An international multicenter study of antimicrobial consumption and
resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates
from 15 hospitals in 14 countries. Microb Drug
Resist. 2004; 10:169-176.
Received on 13.11.2013 Modified on 10.12.2013
Accepted on 15.12.2013
©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy & Phytochem.
6(1): Jan.-Mar. 2014; Page 05-08