Evaluation of Antimicrobial and Phytochemical Properties of some Indigenous Indian plants

 

Robinka Khajuria, Loveleen Kaur*, Aditi Kaushik and Gurpreet Saredia

Department of Biotechnology, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144402

*Corresponding Author E-mail: loveleen.16406@lpu.co.in

 

ABSTRACT:

Methanolic, ethanolic and aqueous extracts of ten indigenous Indian plants Alstonia scholaris, Anthocepalus cadamba, Elaeocarpus ganitrus, Madhuca indica, Butea frundosa, Berberis aristata, Abutilon indicum, Nyctanthes arbor tristis, Aegle marmelos and Urginea indica  were investigated for antimicrobial activity against  E. coli, B. subtilis and S. aureus followed by determination of Minimum inhibitory concentration of the plant extracts. A primary phytochemical screening was done to determine the presence of Terpenoids, Tannins, Anthraquinone, Steroids, Saponins, Alkaloids and Flavonoids. Methanolic extract of  B. aristata was found to have potent antibacterial activity against three bacterial cultures followed by A. indicum. The largest zone of inhibition (24mm) was observed against B. subtilis in the presence of crude Methanolic extract of B. aristata. Minimal Inhibitory concentration B.aristata was found to vary from 40µg/ml to 73µg/ml for the three bacterial cultures. All the tested phytochemicals were present in B.aristata and A. cadamba indicating that these plants could be further exploited for production of bioformulations for treating infectious diseases.

 

KEYWORDS: Antimicrobial property, Berberis aristata, Indigenous plants, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Phytochemicals

 

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

Since the past few decades, emerging and re-emerging multidrug resistant pathogenic strains of microorganisms have become a chief cause of concern for the medical practitioners worldwide.  Screening of several medicinal plants for their potential antimicrobial activity is being noticed due to the increasing failure of conventional chemotherapeutics and antibiotics (Colombo et al.1996, Rojas et al 2003, Bandow et al 2003, Zinn et al 2004). In recent years, secondary plant metabolites (phytochemicals), formerly having unknown pharmacological activities, have been extensively investigated as a source of medicinal agents (Joshi et al 2011). The beneficial products from plants result from combinations of different secondary metabolites like alkaloids, saponins, tannins, anthraquinone, etc. Exploitation of these phytochemicals produced by certain plants can serve as a solution to the ever increasing problem of drug resistant pathogens.

 

India is one of the World’s top 12 mega diversity countries with 10 biogeographical regions. The assemblage of climatic and altitudinal variations coupled with variations in ecological habitats has led to the development of unique diversity in medicinal plants which serve as source of raw material for traditional medicine systems as well as for pharmaceutical industries.(Pushpangadan 2002). India has more than 1/4th of World’s known medicinal plants with over 8000 plants species. Over one and a half million traditional healers use a wide range of medicinal plants for treating ailments of both humans and livestock across the length and breadth of the country. Different parts of ethnomedical plants or their extracts are used for the treatment of various diseases. This study was undertaken in order to carry out preliminary investigative studies on the antimicrobial properties of ten indigenous Indian plants against three test organisms. Moreover, phytochemical analysis was carried out in order to detect the presence of different phytochemicals known for their therapeutic effects.

 

 

 


Table1: List of plants used in the study and their traditional importance

Family

Botanical Name

Local Name

Plant

part Tested

Major Traditional Uses (References)

Apocynaceae

Alstonia scholaris

Sataparni

 (Devil Tree)

Leaves

Treatment of Epilepsy, Asthma, Malarial Fever, Urticaria, Chronic Dysentery, Diarrhoea (Lee et al, 2012)

Rubiaceae

Anthocepalus cadamba

Kadam

Leaves

Antidiuretic, Anthelmintic, Blood purifier, Analgesic

Elaeocar-paceae

Elaeocarpus ganitrus

Rudraksh

Leaves

Treatment of mental diseases, epilepsy, asthma, hypertension, arthritis and liver diseases (Hule and Juvekar, 2009)

Sapotaceae

Madhuca indica

Mahua

Leaves

Pain killer, Anthelmintic, Antidiabetic, Analgesic, Antiarthritis agent (Shekhawat and Vijayvergiya, 2010)

Fabaceae

Butea frundosa

Palash

Leaves

Astringent, Diuretic, Depuretive,

Aphrodisiac and Tonic properties. Effective in leprosy, leucorrhoea and gout. (Das et al, 2012)

Berberidaceae

Berberis aristata

Indian Barberry or Daru Haridra

Leaves

Antipyretic, antibacterial, antihepatotoxic, anticancer antihyperglycaemic, antioxidant and antilipidemic agent. (Potdar et al, 2012)

Malvaceae

Abutilon indicum

Atibala

Leaves

Aphrodisiac, laxative, diuretic, sedative, astringent,tonic, anti-inflammatory, anthelmintic, and analgesic agent. (Rajakaruna et al, 2002)

Oleaceae

Nyctanthes arbortristis

Parijat

or Harsingar

Leaves

Antibacterial, Anthelmintic, Antiinflammatory, Hepatoprotective,  Immunopotential, Antipyretic, Antioxidant and Anti fungal. (Saxena et al, 2002)

Rutaceae

Aegle marmelos

Bael or Bilvapatra

Leaves

Antibacterial, Treatment of constipation and other  gastrointestinal problems. (Pattnaik et al,1996)

Asparagaceae

Urginea indica  

Jangli Kanda

Leaves

Expectorant, cardiac, stimulant, diuretic, bronchitis, chronic asthma, deobstruent (Shiva-Kameshwari et al, 2012)

 


 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Collection of plant material:

Leaves of all the ten indigenous Indian plants, Alstonia scholaris, Anthocepalus cadamba, Elaeocarpus ganitrus, Madhuca indica, Berberis aristata, Abutilon indicum, Nyctanthes arbor-tristis, Aegle marmelos, Urginea indica and Butea frondosa were collected from Botanical garden of Panjab University, Chandigarh and Herbal Garden, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara (Table 1)

 

Preparation of plant sample:

Fresh Green leaves were washed under running tap water, dried in hot air oven at 600C for 24 hours and ground to fine powder.

 

 

 

Maintenance of bacterial culture:

24 hour old broth cultures of Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus were maintained in actively growing state by regular subculturing.

 

Preparation of Plant Extracts:

15 gm of leaf powder was extracted with methanol by continuous hot extraction for 8 hours. The extract obtained was concentrated in vacuum rotary evaporator and was used for determination of antibacterial activity as described by Joshi et al (2011). The crude samples were subjected to phytochemical screening for the presence of Terpenoids, Tannins, Anthraquinone, Steroids, Saponins, Alkaloids and Flavonoids. Similarly extraction was carried out using ethanol as extractant. 15 gm of leaf powder was also used for preparation of hot water extract and extraction was carried out according to Parekh and Chanda (2007).


 

 

Table2: Determination of zone of inhibition of indigenous Indian plant extracts against different test organisms.

 

*Zone of Inhibition(diameter in mm)

Test Organism

               Plants

E. coli

S. aureus

B. subtilis

M

E

A

M

E

A

M

E

A

Alstonia scholaris

12.3

12.0

12.3

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.7

ND

5.6

Anthocepalus cadamba

ND

ND

ND

6.3

ND

6.3

8.3

7.5

8.3

Elaeocarpus ganitrus

8.3

6.5

8.3

8.3

8.0

8.3

6.0

6.0

6.0

Madhuca indica

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

8.3

7.0

8.3

Butea frundosa

6.3

6.0

6.3

6.0

6.0

6.0

ND

ND

ND

Berberis aristata

22.0

20.0

19.0

20.0

20.0

18.0

24.0

20.0

20.0

Abutilon indicum

14.0

18.0

12.0

20.0

16.0

13.0

18.0

14.0

14.0

Nyctanthes arbor – tristis

18.0

16.0

16.0

14.0

14.0

13.0

14.0

16.0

12.0

Aegle marmelos

16.0

11.0

12.0

16.0

16.0

13.0

9.0

12.0

8.0

Urginea indica  

12.0

11.0

11.0

11.0

9.0

9.0

9.0

9.0

8.0

CD@5%

3.29

2.37

1.47

1.48

1.77

1.49

1.74

1.57

1.42

M- Methanolic Extract, E- Ethanolic Extract, A- Aqueous Extract, ND- Not Detected                                

* Average of three replicates

 

 

 


Antimicrobial assay:

Lawn culture of the three bacterial cultures were prepared on nutrient agar plates using sterile swabs. Wells were prepared using 4mm cork borer and 100µl of methanolic extract, ethanolic extract and hot aqueous extract was added in their respective wells. 1mg/ml of Ampicillin was used as Positive control and respective solvent was used as a negative control. Plates were than incubated at 370C for 24 hours. Thereafter diameter of zone of inhibition was measured and recorded. Zone less than 5mm was considered to be non-detectable.

 

Antimicrobial assay:

Lawn culture of the three bacterial cultures were prepared on nutrient agar plates using sterile swabs. Wells were prepared using 4mm cork borer and 100µl of methanolic extract, ethanolic extract and hot aqueous extract was added in their respective wells. 1mg/ml of Ampicillin was used as Positive control and respective solvent was used as a negative control. Plates were than incubated at 370C for 24 hours. Thereafter diameter of zone of inhibition was measured and recorded. Zone less than 5mm was considered to be non-detectable.

 

Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC):

Since methnolic extracts showed better inhibition of microorganisms, so the residues of plant extracts were dissolved to 25 mg/ml using methanol. All extracts were serially diluted two-fold to1.95 μg/ml in a 96-multi- well microplate. 100 μl (1 × 106 CFU/ml) of actively growing bacterial culture was added to each well. Ampicillin was added as reference antibiotic in each assay. Extract-free solution was used as the negative control. Pre-incubation absorbance values were read at 630nm. The microplates were then incubated overnight at 37°C and absorbance values were read after 24h. MIC values were recorded as the lowest concentration of the extract that completely inhibited bacterial growth (Eloff 1998).

 

Phytochemical screening:

Phytochemical screening was done to detect the presence of various secondary metabolites (Tiwari et al 2011, Joshi et al 2011)

Tannins: 0.5gm plant powder dissolved in 10ml distilled water and filtered. To 2ml filtrate, few drops of 1% FeCl3 was added and observed for the occurrence of blue black, green or blue green precipitate.

Steroids: 0.2gm powder was dissolved in 2ml of acetic acid. Conc. sulphuric acid was added to the ice cold sample and checked for violet to blue or bluish green coloration.

Terpenoids: 0.5gm of powder was dissolved in 2ml chloroform. To this 3ml conc. sulphuric acid was added and observed for the occurrence of reddish brown layer at the interface.

Saponins: 1gm powder was dissolved in 5ml distilled water and filtered. To the filtrate, 3ml of distilled water was added and shaken for 5 min and was observed for persistence of frothing after boiling.

Flavonoids: 0.5 gm powder was dissolved in distilled water and filtered. To this 2ml of 10% NaOH was added to give yellow colour. Change from yellow to colourless on keeping was observed.

Alkaloids: 1 gm powder was dissolved in 5ml of 1% aqueous HCl, stirred and filtered. 1ml of Mayer’s reagent was added to 1ml of the filtrate and observed for formation of buff coloured precipitates.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:

Determination of antimicrobial activity of plant extracts:

When methanolic, ethanolic and aqueous extracts of ten plants were compared, it was found that methanolic extract was the most effective against all the three bacterial cultures. E.coli was found to be most susceptible to all the plant extracts followed by S. aureus and B.subtilis though the maximum zone of inhibition (24mm) was exhibited by methanolic extract of B.aristata against B.subtilis followed by E.coli (22mm). Extracts of A. indicum and N. arbor-tristis also proved to be effective inhibitors against all the three bacterial cultures (Table 2). It is not surprising that there are differences in the antimicrobial effects of plant species as this could be due to differences in the phytochemical properties amongst the species. It is quite possible that some of the plants eg Madhuca indica that were ineffective in this study do not possess antibiotic properties, or the plant extracts may have contained antibacterial constituents, just not in sufficient concentrations so as to be effective. It is also possible that the active chemical constituents might not be soluble in the solvents used. Moreover, the drying process may have caused conformational changes to occur in some of the chemical constituents found in these plants.

 

Minimum inhibitory concentration

Two-fold serial dilutions of methanolic extracts of plants were used to determine MIC against E. coli, S. aureus and B. subtilis. MIC for B. aristata was evaluated as 40µg/ml, 69 µg/ml, and 73 µg/ml, for B. subtilis, S. aureus and E. coli respectively showing that it was potent even at low concentrations. When compared with all plant extracts, M. indica was found to be effective at very high concentration (402-525 µg/ml) indicating its poor antimicrobial activity (Table 3).

 

Table3: Minimum inhibitory Concentration of plant extracts against E.coli, S.aureus and B.subtilis

Plants

 

         Microorganism

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (µg/ml)

E.coli

S.aureus

B.subtilis

Alstonia scholaris

87

135

102

Anthocepalus cadamba

175

289

253

Elaeocarpus ganitrus

137

149

102

Madhuca indica

402

525

438

Butea frundosa

149

188

203

Berberis aristata

73

69

40

Abutilon indicum

103

107

125

Nyctanthes arbortristis

140

158

98

Aegle marmelos

156

238

222

Urginea indica  

292

250

188

Incubation Temperature: 37oC


 

Table4: Phytochemical analysis of Plant leaf powder.

Phytochemicals

                  Plants

Terpenoids

Tannins

Anthraquinone

Steroids

Saponins

Alkaloids

Flavonoids

Alstonia scholaris

+

+

+

+

--

--

+

Anthocepalus cadamba

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Elaeocarpus ganitrus

--

+

+

+

+

+

+

Madhuca indica

--

+

+

+

+

+

+

Butea frundosa

+

+

 

 

--

+

--

Berberis aristata

+

+

 

 

+

+

+

Abutilon indicum

+

--

 

 

+

-

+

Nyctanthes arbortristis

+

+

 

 

--

+

+

Aegle marmelos

+

+

 

 

--

+

+

Urginea indica  

+

+

 

 

--

+

--

+- Present   -- Absent

 


 

The MIC can be very crucial for development of bioformulations from this plant. Similar antimicrobial activity of B. aristata against some human pathogenic bacteria has also been demonstrated by Wagh and Vidhale (2010) against Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas spp.

 

Phytochemical analysis

Preliminary phytochemical analysis of extract in powder forms revealed the presence of Terpenoids, Tannins, Anthraquinone, Steroids, Saponins, Alkaloids and Flavonoids. Flavanoids were present in the leaf powder of all the plants while tannins were detected from all plant except A. indicum. Presence of other phytochemicals viz. Terpenoids, saponins and alkaloids varied from plant to plant. B. aristata and A. cadamba were found to be rich in all the tested phytochemicals (Table 4). Phytochemical analysis demonstrated valuable phytoconstituents which can be very useful for therapeutic purposes. Plant extracts exhibiting potent antimicrobial activity were found to contain most of the tested phytochemicals.

 

CONCLUSION:

All the ten plant species used in this study exhibited antimicrobial activities. Most effective results were exhibited by the methanolic extract of Berberis aristata with a MIC of 40µg/ml, against B. subtilis. Primary phytochemical analysis revealed variations in the phytochemical profiles of plants which explains the differences in their antimicrobial actions.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Bandow JE, Brötz H, Leichert LI, Labischinski H, Hecker M. Proteomic approach to understanding antibiotic action. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47: 948-955.

2.       Colombo ML, Bosisio E. Pharmacological activities of Chelidonium majus L (Papaveraceae). Pharmacol Res. 1996; 33: 127-134.

3.       Das C, Dash S and Sahoo DC. Pharmacognostical and phytochemical investigation of Butea frondosa Linn. Bark. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2012; 4 (2):475-482.

4.       Eloff JN. A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta Medica. 1998; 64:711-71.

5.       Hule AMK and Juvekar AR. Effect of alkaloidal fraction of Elaeocarpus ganitrus seeds on murine in vitro immune parameter. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2009; 2(8):1261.

6.       Joshi B, Sah GP, Basnet BB, Bhatt MR, Sharma D, Subedi K, Pandey J and Malla R. Phytochemical extraction and antimicrobial properties of different medicinal plants: Ocimum sanctum (Tulsi), Eugenia caryophyllata (Clove), Achyranthes bidentata (Datiwan) and Azadirachta indica (Neem). J Microbiol Antimicrobials. 2011; 3(1): 1-7.

7.       Lee SJ, Cho SA  An SS, Na YJ, Park NH, Kim HS, Lee CW, Kim HK, Kim EK. Alstonia scholaris R. Br. significantly inhibits retinoid-induced skin irritation in vitro and in vivo. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2012; doi:10.1155/2012/190370. PMC 3170789. PMID 21912567.

8.       Parekh J, Chanda SV. In vitro antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis of some Indian medicinal plants. Turk J Biol 2007; 31: 53-58.

9.       Pattnaik S, Subramanyam VR and Kole C. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of ten essential oils in vitro. Microbios. 1996; 86 (349): 237–246.

10.     Potdar D, Hirwani RR, and Dhulap S. Phyto-chemical and pharmacological applications of Berberis aristata. Fitoterapia.2012; 83 (5):817-30.

11.     Pushpangadan P. Biodiversity and emerging benefit sharing arrangements-challenges and opportunities for India. Proc. Indian. Natn. Sci. Acad. 2002; B68 (3): 296-314.

12.     Rajakaruna N, Harris CS and Towers GHN. Antimicrobial Activity of Plants Collected from Serpentine Outcrops in Sri Lanka. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2002; 40 (3): 235–244.

13.     Rojas R, Bustamante B, Bauer J, Fernández I, Albán J, Lock O. Antimicrobial activity of selected Peruvian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003; 88: 199- 204.

14.     Saxena RS, Gupta B and Lata S. Tranquilizing, antihistaminic and purgative activity of Nyctanthes arbor -tristis leaf extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002; 81 (3): 321–5.

15.     Shekhawat N and Vijayvergia R. Investigation of Anti-Inflammatory, Analgesic and Antipyretic Properties of Madhuca indica GMEL. International Journal of Molecular Medicine and Advanced Sciences. 2010; 6(2): 26-30.

16.     Shiva-Kameshwari MN, Lakshman AB and  Paramasivam G. Biosystematics studies on medicinal plant Urginea indica Kunth. liliaceae - A review. Int J  Pharm & Life Sci. 2012; 3(1):1394-1406.

17.     Tiwari P, Kumar B, Kaur M, Kaur G and Kaur H. Phytochemical screening and Extraction: A Review. Internationale Pharmaceutica Sciencia. 2011; 1(1):98-106.

18.     Wagh S and Vidhale N.N. Antimicrobial activity of Berberis aristata against some human pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Biosci Biotech Res Comm. 2010; 3(1): 38-42.

19.     Zinn CS, Westh H, Rosdahl VK, and Sarisa Study Group. An international multicenter study of antimicrobial consumption and resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 15 hospitals in 14 countries. Microb Drug Resist. 2004; 10:169-176.

 

 

 

Received on 13.11.2013       Modified on 10.12.2013

Accepted on 15.12.2013      ©A&V Publications All right reserved

Res.  J. Pharmacognosy & Phytochem. 6(1): Jan.-Mar. 2014; Page 05-08